Main menu


Cosmological Principle Proves the Universe Is Not Expanding

The Cosmological Principle was advanced in the mid twentieth century. It states two physical characteristics of our universe. To begin with, that our universe is Homogeneous; i.e., that it has a similar thickness and structure in all areas. Indeed, even where worlds are bunched into vast groups, these bunches are encompassed by noteworthy voids that level out the thickness of issue all through the universe. The second nature of the Cosmological Principle is that our universe is Isotropic, implying that it appears to be identical every which way, i.e., there is no favored heading when seeing the universe. Late investigation of radio and photographic information by different telescopes and instruments has affirmed the legitimacy of the Cosmological Principle. 

Cosmological Principle Proves the Universe Is Not Expanding

The universe is proposed to be extending at around 71 kilometers for every second, per megaparsec (each 3.2616 million light years remove). Be that as it may, a universe growing at this speed can't be Homogeneous. The blunder between mass thickness as measured and the distinction in thickness required by spatial development renders the hypothesis of a Big Bang starting and consistent extension outlandish. 

To investigate this thickness issue we should take a gander at the geometry of concentric circles. It is instructed in geometry classes that a circle of span R has a volume of (4/3 Pi R-cubed); While a moment circle where the range is one/half of R has a volume that is 1/8 the volume of the circle of sweep R; ( R/2-cubed measures up to R-cubed/2-cubed, which breaks even with R-cubed/8 ). So for instance, a growing universe at 13.78 billion light years separation would need significantly more mass thickness than the universe would have at 6.89 billion light years remove from us; and the universe at 6.89 billion light years separation would have eight times the thickness than happens close to our world today, on the grounds that the universe of today is eight times the volume of the universe at 6.89 billion years old. Since the thickness of mass all through the universe is measured to be the same, this by itself is adequate to demonstrate that the universe is not growing. 

There are two-time expansion issues too, for the hypothesis of extending space. When something is subsiding from us, say at 10% of the speed of light it requires 11 seconds to get a record of 10 seconds of action happening in that area, on the grounds that in the 10 seconds in which a movement happened, that area has retreated 10sec x 30,000km/sec or 300,000 km advance away, which approaches one moment of light travel time. For a retreat speed of half of the speed of light, 10 seconds of movement requires 15 seconds to be recorded by us. This is the time widening we should quantify at 6.89 billion light years remove (half). Since the revolution of cosmic systems like our Milky Way turn in time spans of 200 to 250 million years adjacent, they ought to be measured as pivoting in time periods of 300 to 375 million years at 6.89 billion light years separate. No such time expansion is accounted for. The absence of time widening demonstrates that the universe is not growing. Essentially for Type 1a Supernovas, their light bends of building and melting away light ought to be expanded by half at a separation of 6.89 billion light years. Except for one Type 1a Supernova, no time enlargement has been recorded; and the one exemption could be clarified by concealed mass ( huge planets or dim stars) being consumed by the Supernova amid its touchy stage, which could supply the broadened light vitality that was recorded on that one occasion. Once more, the absence of time enlargement for Type 1a Supernovas is hazardous for the hypothesis of spatial development. 

One last issue for the hypothesis of spatial extension is an occurrence that should trouble Astronomers and Cosmologists. This is the incident that the assessed age of the universe is 13.78 billion years, requiring 13.78 billion years for light to go to our area from the Big Bang; while the figured separation for the universe to achieve the extension speed of 300,000 km/sec in our area, which is the speed of light, is 13.78 billion light a long time for a development speed of 71km/sec/maps. This takes after from isolating 300,000 km/sec by 71km/sec/MPs and touching base at a separation of 4225.35 megaparsecs; which increased by 3.2616 million light years for each megaparsec gives 13.78 billion light years. So we are unintentional, seconds ago retreating at the speed of light from the cause of the Big Bang, if such an occasion happened. For our area to be extending at the speed of light from a point that by both separation and time of light travel is 13.78 billion light years and 13.78 billion years separately, asks credulity.